Industry Plaintiffs Appeal PoolCorp Decision

Consumers who filed suit may have time to also appeal

1 MIN READ
PoolCorp CEO Manuel Perez de la Mesa

PoolCorp CEO Manuel Perez de la Mesa

Unhappy with the outcome of a class-action anti-trust lawsuit against PoolCorp, one set of plaintiffs has appealed the case.

PoolCorp and the Big 3 manufacturers faced lawsuits from two separate groups — one of industry professionals and one of consumers — both alleging anti-competitive practices. The manufacturers settled, while PoolCorp continued on. As part of its strategy, the megadistributor’s legal team filed a series of summary judgment motions, hoping the judge would throw out one accusation at a time. That is how the case ended on July 1, when the final summary judgment was granted.

The plaintiffs had 30 days to appeal. At month’s end, the industry group had done just that. But a unique sequence in the judge’s filings may buy the consumer plaintiffs more time. After the last summary judgment, PoolCorp requested a free-standing order officially declaring the case was found in the distributor’s favor. The judge filed the order on Aug. 4, which the consumer group may be able to use as a new start date.

About the Author

Rebecca Robledo

Rebecca Robledo is deputy editor of Pool & Spa News and Aquatics International. She is an award-winning trade journalist with more than 25 years experience reporting on and editing content for the pool, spa and aquatics industries. She specializes in technical, complex or detail-oriented subject matter with an emphasis in design and construction, as well as legal and regulatory issues. For this coverage and editing, she has received numerous awards, including four Jesse H. Neal Awards, considered by many to be the “Pulitzer Prize of Trade Journalism.”

No recommended contents to display.